Water soluble polymer composite

ABSTRACT

A water soluble polymer composition includes a water soluble polymer and a sugar and may be used as a support in additive manufacturing processes.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No.62/511,585 filed May 26, 2017, which is hereby incorporated byreference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to compositions and methods for producing andusing water soluble polymer compositions.

BACKGROUND

Additive manufacturing processes, commonly referred to asthree-dimensional (3D) printing, can be used to construct desiredobjects with possible applications in numerous industries (e.g.,aerospace, automotive, medical, etc). Exemplary processes include, butare not limited to, electron beam melting (EBM), fused depositionmodeling (FDM), ink jetting, laminated object manufacturing (LOM),selective laser sintering (SLS), and stereolithography (SL). Using suchprocesses, a desired object can be modeled in a computer-aided design(CAD) package and printed using a selected build material. Fordeposition based methods, like FDM, the selected build material istypically extruded through a heated printer in a layered manneraccording to computer instruction. Printing in commercially availableadditive manufacturing devices, like, for example, the ARBURG™Freeformer system, often occurs in a build chamber that can providedesired heating and temperature control based on the selected buildmaterial.

Many additive manufacturing techniques use support layers or structuresto build a desired object. The limited availability of suitable supportmethods, materials, and structures, however, has restricted printing tocertain design types. The most basic support method uses the samematerial for support as it does for the printed object, as, for example,shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,228,923, 6,790,403 and 8,404,171. With thistechnique, the support is erected similarly to scaffolding on a buildingand “props up” any steeply angled overhangs or spans. Referred to as“breakable” or “raft” support, this type of support can be effective,but can also be messy, time-consuming, and difficult to remove bymechanical breakage or trimming. It is not unusual to spend hourscleaning or cutting away support material from a 3D-printed object usingrazor blades, scalpels, sandpaper, and even power tools. Methods usingdifferent support and printed materials can also be problematic. Forexample, certain hydrophobic polymers (e.g., polypropylene) are nearlyimpossible to print due to the incompatibility between the supportmaterials and the 3D-printed base resin.

The inability to remove internal support materials can further restrictobject design types. Some external geometries can make it difficult, ifnot impossible, to remove internal support material. For years, manyhave tried to solve this problem with support structures that aresupposed to dissolve in very hot water, highly acidic or basicconditions, organic solvents, or various other chemicals. These productsare often messy and even dangerous—and in general have beenunsuccessful.

SUMMARY

Surprisingly, water soluble polymer compositions, including a watersoluble polymer (e.g., butenediol vinylalcohol copolymer (BVOH)) and asugar (e.g., trehalose), can solve several additive manufacturingproblems: such compositions can dissolve in room temperature water, atneutral pH, can be compatible with both hydrophilic and hydrophobicpolymers, and can be used as a support material for build chambertemperatures above 140° C., which may, for example, be desirable whenprinting high temperature thermoplastics.

The advantages of water soluble polymer compositions are unexpected.Water soluble polymers are often brittle and thus not suited for use inconventional filament type additive manufacturing techniques. Some havetried to address this issue by using plasticizers, but this candramatically reduce the temperature resistance of water solublepolymers, which can markedly limit the availability of water solublepolymers as a support material and thus the type of build materials thatcan be printed. Likewise, sugars, while often highly water soluble, tendto be brittle at room temperature and have low melt viscosity. Usingcurrent equipment and practices, sugars cannot be extruded into usefulfilaments. Furthermore, most sugars are heat sensitive and caramelize ordegrade above melting temperatures, making sustained extrusionimpractical or impossible.

The present disclosure shows that water soluble polymers and sugars canbe substantially compatible. Water soluble polymer compositionsincluding a water soluble polymer and a sugar can exhibit improvedstiffness at higher temperatures and improved rheological properties.The addition of a sugar to a water soluble polymer can also provide atackifying effect, offering improved adhesion of the composition to avariety of substrates (e.g., a build plate). Without intending to belimited by theory, the sugar may be imparting pressure sensitivecharacteristics to facilitate improved adhesion at printingtemperatures, as described by the Dahlquist Criterion.

Accordingly, in one embodiment, a water soluble polymer compositionincludes a water soluble polymer and a sugar. In another embodiment, awater soluble polymer composition includes a continuous water solublepolymeric phase and a sugar dispersed throughout the continuous watersoluble polymeric phase. In some embodiments, the water soluble polymercomposition can also include one or more polymers or additives. Inanother embodiment, an article includes a continuous polymeric phasewith a water soluble polymer composition that further includes a watersoluble polymer, a sugar, and an additive material dispersed throughoutthe continuous polymeric phase.

In another embodiment, a method includes providing a water solublepolymer and a sugar, mixing the water soluble polymer and the sugar, andmelt processing the water soluble polymer and sugar mixture. In anotherembodiment, a method of using a water soluble polymer compositionincludes providing the above-described water soluble polymercomposition, melt processing the water soluble polymer composition, andprinting the water soluble polymer composition into a desired object. Inanother embodiment, a method of making a water soluble polymercomposition filament includes melt processing a water soluble polymerand a sugar to provide a water soluble polymer composition, cooling thewater soluble polymer composition, and drawing down the water solublepolymer composition. In another embodiment, a method of using a watersoluble polymer composition that includes a water soluble polymer and asugar as a filament in fused deposition modeling includes forming afilament that contains the above-described water soluble polymercomposition.

In other embodiments, a water soluble polymer composition support systemincludes an additive manufacturing device having a build chamber, thebuild chamber having a build chamber temperature; a printed objecthaving a desired shape, the printed object comprising a high temperaturethermoplastic build material; and one or more supports positioned aboutthe printed object, the one or more supports comprising a water solublepolymer composition; wherein the build chamber temperature can reach atleast about 140° C.

In other embodiments, a three-dimensional printed article includes athree-dimensional printed object generally disposed on a substantiallyhorizontal build plate; and one or more soluble supports positionedabout and supporting one or more portions of the three-dimensionalprinted object, the soluble supports comprising a water soluble polymercomposition.

The above summary is not intended to describe each disclosed embodimentor every implementation. The detailed description that follows moreparticularly exemplifies illustrative embodiments.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a butenediol vinylalcohol copolymer (BVOH), a watersoluble polymer, and trehalose composition, three-dimensionally printedon a standard acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and nylon buildplate.

FIG. 2 illustrates a BVOH and trehalose composition three-dimensionallyprinted onto an ultra-highmolecular weight polyethylene build plate.

FIG. 3 is a plot of rheology curves for BVOH and trehalose formulations.

FIG. 4A shows a 50/50 wt % BVOH/trehalose composition filament beforestretching.

FIG. 4B shows the filament of FIG. 4A after stretching.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Unless the context indicates otherwise the following terms shall havethe following meaning and shall be applicable to the singular andplural:

The terms “a,” “an,” “the,” “at least one,” and “one or more” are usedinterchangeably. Thus, for example, a water soluble polymericcomposition containing “a” water soluble polymer means that the watersoluble polymeric composition may include “one or more” water solublepolymers.

The terms “additive manufacturing”, “three-dimensional printing”, or “3Dprinting” refer to any process used to create a three-dimensional objectin which successive layers of material are formed under computer control(e.g., electron beam melting (EBM), fused deposition modeling (FDM), inkjetting, laminated object manufacturing (LOM), selective laser sintering(SLS), and stereolithography (SL)).

The term “build chamber” refers to a volume, often enclosed, in orutilized by an additive manufacturing device within which a desiredcomponent can be printed. A non-limiting example of build chamber can befound in an ARBURG™ Freeformer (commercially available from Arburg GmbH,Lossburg, Germany).

The term “build chamber temperature” refers to the temperature providedin a build chamber during additive manufacturing.

The term “build material” refers to a material that is printed in threedimensions using an additive manufacturing process to produce a desiredobject, often remaining after removal of a soluble support.

The term “build plate” refers to a substrate, often a removable film orsheet, that a build material or soluble support can be printed on.

The terms “disaccharide,” “double sugar,” or “biose” mean any class ofsugars whose molecules contain two monosaccharide residues joined by aglycosidic linkage.

The terms “draw”, “draw down”, “drawn”, “drawing”, or “stretching” referto the process of elongating an melt processed feedstock at temperaturesnear (within about 50° C.) the glass transition temperature of apolymeric composition.

The term “draw ratio” refers to the ratio of material thickness (e.g.,filament diameter) before drawing to the material thickness afterdrawing.

The term “feedstock” refers to the form of a material that can beutilized in an additive manufacturing process (e.g., as a build materialor soluble support). Non-limiting feedstock examples include, but arenot limited to, pellets, powders, filaments, billets, liquids, sheets,shaped profiles, etc.

The term “high temperature thermoplastic” refers to a polymer orpolymeric composition that is typically melt processed at or above about220° C. Non-limiting examples of high temperature thermoplasticsinclude, but are not limited to polycarbonate (PC), polyamides (Nylon),polyesters (PET), polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and polyetherimide(PEI).

The term “melt processing technique” means a technique for applyingthermal and mechanical energy to reshape, blend, mix, or otherwisereform a polymer or composition, such as compounding, extrusion,injection molding, blow molding, rotomolding, or batch mixing.

The term “mixing” means to combine or put together to form one singlesubstance, mass, or phase. This may include, but is not limited to, allphysical blending methods, extrusion techniques, or solution methods.

The term “monosaccharide” means any simple sugars with multiple hydroxylgroups. Based on the number of carbons (e.g., 3, 4, 5, or 6), amonosaccharide can be a triose, tetrose, pentose, or hexose, etc.

The term “oligosaccharide” means a small number (e.g., 2 to 6 or 2 to 4)monosaccharide residues covalently linked.

The terms “polymer” and “polymeric” mean a molecule of high relativemolecular mass, the structure of which essentially contains multiplerepetitions of units derived, actually or conceptually, from moleculesof low relative molecular mass.

The term “polymer composition” means a mixture of a water solublepolymer and a sugar.

The term “polysaccharide” means carbohydrate polymers containing chainsof monosacchride and disaccharide units (e.g., starch, cellulose,glycrogen, etc.).

The terms “preferred” and “preferably” refer to embodiments that mayafford certain benefits, under certain circumstances. Other embodiments,however, may also be preferred, under the same or other circumstances.Furthermore, the recitation of one or more preferred embodiments doesnot imply that other embodiments are not useful, and is not intended toexclude other embodiments from the claimed scope.

The term “semi-crystalline” refers to a polymeric composition polymericcomposition with crystallinity greater than 5% but less than 90% asmeasured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).

The term “soluble support” or “soluble support material” refers to amaterial that is printed in three dimensions using an additivemanufacturing process to physically support or brace the build materialduring printing and that can be removed by chemical salvation ordissolution as desired during or after the additive manufacturingprocess.

The term “substantially dry” means that the substance contains by weightabout 15% or less volatiles, and preferably about 10% or less volatiles,at standard conditions based on the weight of the water soluble polymercomposition.

The terms “substantially miscible” or “substantial miscibility” refer tothe compatibility of materials in a blend (e.g., a water soluble polymercomposition), such that the blend exhibits behavior expected of a singlephase system, often shown by the blend having a single glass transitionand/or melting temperature (e.g., when tested using differentialscanning calorimetry).

The terms “substantially stable” or “substantial stability” refer to amaterial that largely exhibits dimensional stability (e.g., with minimalflow, melting, or deformation) at processing temperatures (e.g., a buildchamber temperature).

The term “water soluble” means a material that absorbs, swells,dissolves, or deteriorates in the presence of water.

The term “water soluble polymer composition” refers to a compositionthat includes a water soluble polymer and a sugar.

The recitation of numerical ranges using endpoints includes all numberssubsumed within that range (e.g. 1 to 5 includes 1, 1.5, 3, 3.95, 4.2,5, etc.).

This disclosure relates to compositions and methods for producing andusing water soluble polymer compositions. Such water soluble polymercompositions can solve several problems in conventional additivemanufacturing. As illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2, water soluble polymercompositions can be printed on a standard build plate. FIG. 1 showsbutenediol vinylalcohol copolymer (BVOH) and trehalose composition 12printed on a standard acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and nylonbuild plate 10. FIG. 2 shows BVOH and trehalose composition 22 printedon to ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene build plate 20. TheBVOH/trehalose composition shown in FIG. 2 adhered well to the buildplate during printing.

FIG. 3 is a rheology curve plot comparing the apparent viscosity (Pa·s)as a function of shear rate (1/s) at a temperature of 210° C. FIG. 3'splot includes curve 24 for 100 wt % trehalose, curve 26 for 100 wt %BVOH, curve 28A for 50/50 wt % BVOH/trehalose, and curve 28B for 85/15wt % BVOH/trehalose. As illustrated in FIG. 3, a BVOH and trehaloseblend can exhibit enhanced rheological properties over pure trehalose.In particular, BVOH can enhance the melt viscosity of trehalose, canexpand processing and printability temperature window(s), and canenhance ductility of the mixture.

FIGS. 4A and 4B show 50/50 wt % BVOH/trehalose composition filament 30before, as 30A, and after stretching, as 30B. FIGS. 4A and 4B, forexample, illustrate the suitability of the disclosed water solublepolymer compositions as a feedstock (here, a filament) for FDM. FIG. 4Ashows that BVOH/trehalose composition 30A can be brittle and breaks whentrying to bend it. But FIG. 4B shows that stretching has aligned theBVOH chains, and significantly increased the toughness and flexibilitywhile reducing the brittleness of the material. For FDM printing, havingflexibility can be critical to ensuring the material feeds uniformlyduring the FDM 3D printing process, ultimately leading to better prints.Stretching of the BVOH/trehalose composition can also inducecrystallinity in the BVOH polymer.

A variety of water soluble polymers may be used in water soluble polymercompositions. Non-limiting examples of water soluble polymers includecoagulants, such as quaternary polyamines, polydiallyl ammonium chloride(polyDADMAC), and dicyandiamide resins; flocculants, such as nonionic,anionic, and cationic materials; amphoteric polymers;polyethyleneimines; polyamide-amines; polyamine-based polymers;polyethylene oxides; sulphonated compounds; polyvinylpyrrolidone;polylactic acid; polylactones; polyacrylate-type dispersants; polyalcohols; cellulose derivatives; or combinations thereof. Non-limingexamples of commercially available water soluble polymers include BVOH,sold as NICHIGO G-POLYMER™ by Nippon Goshei, poly-2-ethyloxazoline, soldas AQUAZOL™ by Polymer Chemistry Innovations, Inc., and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, sold as AFFINISOL™ by Dow Chemical Co.

A variety of sugars may be used in the disclosed water soluble polymercompositions. Such sugars can enhance solubility and adhesion tohydrophobic polymers. Non-limiting examples of sugars includemonosaccharides, disaccharides, oligosaccharides, polysaccharides, orderivatives thereof. A non-limiting example of a useful sugar istrehalose, sold as TREHA™ sugar by Cargill. Other exemplary sugarsinclude, but are not limited to, sucrose, lactulose, lactose, maltose,cellobiose, chitobiose octaacetate, kojibiose, nigerose octaacetate,isomaltose, isomaltulose, beta,beta-trehalose, alpha,beta-trehalose,sophorose, laminaribiose, gentiobiose, turanose, maltulose, palatinose,gentiobiulose, mannobiose, melibiose, melibiulose, ructinose,ructinulose, melezitose or xylobiose. Other exemplary sugars and theirrespective melting points are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1 SUGAR MELTING POINTS Material Melting Point (° C.) chitobioseoctaacetate 304-405 laminaribiose 253 cellobiose 225 trehalose 203lactose 203 sophorose 196-198 xylobiose 195 gentiobiose 190-195 sucrose186 kojibiose 175 lactulose 169 Maltose (anhydrous) 160-165 meletiose152 turanose 142 palatinose 125-128 maltulose 125 isomaltulose 123melibose  85

A water soluble polymer composition can employ a variety of otherpolymers, which may miscible or non-miscible with water soluble polymercompositions. Non-limiting examples of polymers that can be used to makesuch an article include high density polyethylene (HDPE), low densitypolyethylene (LDPE), linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE),crosslinked polyethylene (PEX), vulcanized rubber, functional polyolefincopolymers including polyolefin based ionomers, polypropylene (PP),polyolefin copolymers (e.g., ethylene-butene, ethylene-octene, ethylenevinyl alcohol), polystyrene, polystyrene copolymers (e.g., high impactpolystyrene, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene copolymer), polyacrylates,polymethacrylates, polyesters, polyvinylchloride (PVC), fluoropolymers,polyamides, polyether imides, polyphenylene sulfides, polysulfones,polyacetals, polycarbonates, polyphenylene oxides, polyurethanes,thermoplastic elastomers (e.g., SIS, SEBS, SBS), epoxies, alkyds,melamines, phenolics, ureas, vinyl esters, cynate esters, silicones, orcombinations thereof

A water soluble polymer composition can also employ a variety ofadditives, which may also be miscible or non-miscible with the watersoluble polymer composition. Non-limiting examples of suitable additivesinclude antioxidants, light stabilizers, fibers, blowing agents, foamingadditives, antiblocking agents, heat reflective materials, heatstabilizers, impact modifiers, biocides, antimicrobial additives,compatibilizers, plasticizers, tackifiers, processing aids, lubricants,coupling agents, thermal conductors, electrical conductors, catalysts,flame retardants, oxygen scavengers, fluorescent tags, inert fillers,minerals, and colorants. Additives may be incorporated into a watersoluble polymer composition as a powder, liquid, pellet, granule, or inany other extrudable form. The amount and type of conventional additivesin the water soluble polymer composition may vary depending upon thepolymeric matrix and the desired properties of the finished composition.In view of this disclosure, persons having ordinary skill in the artwill recognize that an additive and its amount can be selected in orderto achieve desired properties in the finished material. Typical additiveloading levels may be, for example, approximately 0.01 to 5 wt % of thecomposition formulation.

Various water soluble polymer and sugar compositions, including optionaladditional polymers and additives, can be employed in a water solublepolymer composition. The disclosed water soluble polymer compositionmay, for example, include at least about 10 wt % water soluble polymer,or at least about 20 wt % water soluble polymer, or at least about 40 wt% water soluble polymer, and up to about 50 wt % water soluble polymer,or up to about 85 wt % water soluble polymer, or up to about 90 wt %water soluble polymer. In another example, the final composition mayinclude at least about 0.1 wt % sugar, or at least about 1 wt % sugar,or at least about 2 wt % sugar, or at least about 5 wt % sugar, or atleast about 20% sugar, and up to about 50 wt % sugar, or up to about 75wt % sugar, or up to about 90 wt % sugar, or about to about 95 wt %sugar, or up to about 99.9 wt % sugar.

In preferred embodiments, water soluble polymer compositions can includeBVOH and trehalose. BVOH tends to be both water soluble and stable aboveits melting point. In addition, trehalose tends to be athermodynamically and kinetically stable, non-reducing, and naturaldisaccharide. The combination can provide numerous benefits. Asillustrated in FIG. 3, BVOH and trehalose can exhibit enhancedrheological properties over pure trehalose. Also, trehalose can enhancewater solubility of the composition, can enhance adhesion to hydrophobicpolymers (e.g., polyolefins), can increase stiffness at highertemperatures, can improve adhesion to common/typical build platematerials, and can increase brittleness with higher loading levels,which may allow easier breakaway of or from the 3D printed part.

In such preferred embodiments, the disclosed water soluble polymercomposition may, for example, include at least about 10 wt % BVOH, atleast about 20 wt % BVOH, or at least about 40 wt % BVOH, and up toabout 50 wt % BVOH, or up to about 85 wt % BVOH, or up to about 90 wt %BVOH. In another example, the final composition may include at leastabout 0.1 wt % trehalose, or at least about 1 wt % trehalose, or atleast about 2 wt % trehalose, or at least about 5 wt % trehalose, or atleast about 20% trehalose, and up to about 50 wt % trehalose, or up toabout 75 wt % trehalose, or up to about 90 wt % trehalose, or about toabout 95 wt % trehalose, or up to about 99.9 wt % trehalose.

Water soluble polymer compositions, including any optional polymers andadditives, can be prepared by mixing. Depending on the selectedpolymeric matrix, this can be done using a variety of mixing processesknown to those skilled in the art. The water soluble polymer, sugar, andoptional additives can be combined together by any of the blending meansusually employed in the plastics industry, such as with a compoundingmill, a Banbury mixer, or a mixing extruder. In another preferredembodiment, a vented twin screw extruder is utilized. The materials maybe used in the form, for example, of a powder, a pellet, or a granularproduct. The mixing operation is most conveniently carried out at atemperature above the melting point or softening point of the watersoluble polymer, sugar, or both the water soluble polymer and sugar. Theresulting melt processed water soluble polymer composition can beextruded directly into the form of the final product shape, or can bepelletized or fed from the melt processing equipment into a secondaryoperation to pelletize the composition (e.g., using a pellet mill ordensifier) for later use. In another embodiment, the water solublepolymer composition and optional additives can be 3D printed.

Water soluble polymer compositions can provide a number of advantages.One key advantage is that the dissolution rate (e.g., mg/min ascalculated according to Dissolution Method Test 2) can be increasedsignificantly. In some embodiments, the dissolution rate is increased bymore than 20% when compared to the water soluble polymer component, andanother embodiment the dissolution rate is increased by more than 50%when compared to the water soluble polymer component, in anotherembodiment the dissolution rate is increased by more than 75% whencompared to the water soluble polymer component. In other embodiments,the dissolution rate of the water soluble polymer composition is atleast 400 mg/min, in a preferred embodiment the dissolution rate is atleast 600 mg/min, in a most preferred embodiment the dissolution rate isat least 800 mg/min. Water soluble polymer compositions can also besubstantially stable at build chamber temperatures of at least about140° C., or at least about 150° C., or at least about 170° C., or atleast about 190° C., or at least about 210° C., and up to about 300° C.

The disclosed water soluble polymer composition can undergo additionalprocessing for desired end-use applications.

Water soluble polymer compositions can be used as a feedstock in fuseddeposition modeling (FDM). In some preferred embodiments, the feedstockmay be a filament but other feedstocks (e.g., film, sheet, shapedprofile, powder, pellet, etc.) can also be used. While some watersoluble polymer compositions with higher sugar loading may bewell-suited for use as a water soluble support in some additivemanufacturing processes, such compositions may be too brittle for use insome FDM processes. In particular, feedstock having such compositionsmay break when pulled through the path and pushed into a heated nozzle.It may be necessary to draw down or stretch the composition while it iscooled to enhance the toughness. By drawing down or stretching thecomposition, the water soluble polymer chains as well as the sugarbecome aligned in the direction of pull, which ultimately toughens thecomposition making it possible to turn the composition into a feedstockthat does not break, or is much less likely to break, during the FDM 3Dprinting process.

Without intending to be limited by theory, drawing can increase thecrystallinity of the extruded feedstock through a stress alignmentphenomenon. It is well known in additive manufacturing that it can bechallenging to print semi-crystalline and crystalline polymers becausethey have a tendency to shrink in the build chamber when allowed torelax. This can result in part warpage and curling. Surprisingly, watersoluble polymer compositions, despite being semi-crystalline, provideprinted parts with low warpage. This may be in part due to the excellentadhesion of the water soluble composition to a variety of buildmaterials and to the build plate. The disclosed water soluble polymercompositions also show remarkable adhesion properties to a wide range ofbuild plates and build materials including: polyethylene, polypropylene,ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UMHWD),polytetrafluoroethylene. polyamide (e.g., Nylon 6, Nylon 6.6, Nylon 12),polyimide (e.g, Kapton), polyether-imide (PEI), polyethteretherkeetone(PEEK), polyacrylonitrile-butadiene-stryrene (ABS), polylactic acid(PLA), polyacrylic (e.g, PMMA), polycarbonate (PC) and others.

In some embodiments, drawing can occur at temperatures near or justbelow the glass transition temperature of the water soluble polymer. Inone embodiment, the draw ratio of the feedstock process is at leastbetween 1.5 and 10:1, in a preferred embodiment, the draw ratio of thefeedstock process is between 1.5 and 5:1, in a most preferredembodiment, the draw ratio is between 1.5 and 3:1. Such alignment canincrease the crystallinity of the extruded feedstock and dramaticallyimprove certain mechanical properties (e.g., tensile strength andductility) that enable it to function in a printer. The drawing can beachieved by a number of methods. In some embodiments, the feedstock canbe conventionally extruded, and then processed using a godet operationthat can heat and draw the filament at the proper temperatures. Thisoperation can be performed inline or offline. Alternatively, watersoluble polymer compositions can be extruded and cooled, and reheatedbetween two or more pullers that are operating at different pull speedsto draw the filament. It is also possible to precisely cool the extrudedcomposition and draw inline using an appropriate downstream extrusiondesign. In view of this disclosure, person of ordinary skill in the artwill appreciate other ways of achieving desired draw ratios and chainalignment to produce a feedstock, such as a filament, of the disclosedwater soluble polymer compositions.

In another embodiment, a feedstock can include a water soluble polymerthat does not contain a sugar. In this instance, the water solublepolymer is semi-crystalline and is substantially stable at temperaturesabove 140° C. and has water solubility of at least 100 mg/min (perDissolution Test Method 2). The feedstock of the water soluble polymerof this composition is optionally drawn to improve its toughness. In apreferred embodiment, the draw ratio is at least 1.5:1 for compositionscontaining a water soluble polymer. Preferred water soluble polymersinclude BVOH (commercially available as NICHIGO G-POLYMER™ from NipponGoshei. Preferred grades include Nichigo G8049 and Nichigo G1028.

In another embodiment, the disclosed water soluble polymer compositionmay be converted into articles using conventional melt processingtechniques, such as compounding, extrusion, molding, and casting, oradditive manufacturing processes. For use in additive manufacturingprocesses, a variety of additive manufacturing devices can employ watersoluble polymer compositions, as, for example, a support or buildmaterial. Non-limiting examples of such additive manufacturing devicesinclude, but are not limited to, the Dremel DigiLab 3D45 3D Printer,LulzBot Mini 3D Printer, MakerBot Replicator+, XYZprinting da VinciMini, Formlabs Form 2, Ultimaker 3, Flashforge Finder 3D Printer, Robo3D R1+Plus, Ultimaker 2+. Water soluble polymer compositions can beselectively removed as either a build or support material (e.g., bydissolution or mechanically) manually, automatically (e.g., computercontrolled dissolution), or by some combination thereof.

A variety of polymers and additives, such as those already disclosedabove, can be added to the disclosed water soluble polymer compositionto form an article.

The disclosed compositions and articles have broad utility in a numberof industries, including, but not limited to, additive manufacturing.These compositions and articles can provide significant value toplastics compounders and converters. The disclosed compositions andarticles offer enhanced solubility and adhesion to hydrophobic polymers,tunable rheological properties, and increased stiffness at highertemperatures.

In the following Examples, all parts and percentages are by weightunless otherwise indicated.

EXAMPLES

TABLE 2 MATERIALS Material Supplier Water Soluble Polymer 1 NICHIGOG-POLYMER ™, 8049, water (WSP 1) soluble polymer, Butenediolvinylalcohol (BVOH), commercially available from Nippon Goshei (Osaka,Japan) Water Soluble Polymer 2 AQUAZOL ™ 50, water soluble polymer, (WSP2) poly-2-ethyloxazoline (PEOx), commercially available from PolymerChemistry Innovations, Inc (Tucson, AZ) Water Soluble Polymer 3AFFINSOL ™ 100LV, water soluble (WSP 3) polymer, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), commercially available from Dow Chemical(Midland, MI) Water Soluble Polymer 4 NICHIGO G-POLYMER ™, 1028, water(WSP 4) soluble polymer, Butenediol vinylalcohol (BVOH), commerciallyavailable from Nippon Goshei (Osaka, Japan) PEI ULTEM ™ 9085,polyetherimide, commercially available from Sabic, Inc. Sugar 1 TREHA ™,sugar, trehalose, , commercially available from Cargill (Hopkins, MN)Sugar 2 Sugar, sucralose, commercially available from Tate and Lyle(McIntosh, Alabama) Sugar 3 sugar, sucrose, commercially available fromCargill (Hopkins, MN)

TABLE 3 EXPERIMENTAL FORMULATIONS Formu- WSP WSP WSP WSP Sugar SugarSugar lation 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 100 2 100 3 95 5 4 85 15 5 75 25 6 50 50 785 15 8 10 20 30 20 20 9 85 15 10 50 50 11 20 20 20 20 20 12 50 50 13 1020 10 20 20 20 14 90 10 15 35 35 30 16 40 50 5 5 17 10 80 10

Sample Preparation: Formulations 1-17

Each of Formulations 1-17 was prepared according to the weight ratios inTable 3 (Formulations 3-17 were first blended in a plastic bag) andgravimetrically fed into a 27 mm twin screw extruder (52:1 L:D,commercially available from ENTEK™ Extruders, Lebanon, Oreg.).Compounding was performed using the following temperature profile inzones 1-13: 100, 350, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400, 400,and 400 degrees Fahrenheit (about 38, 177, 204, 204, 204, 204, 204, 204,204, 204, 204, 204, and 204 degrees Celsius, respectively). Theextruder's screw speed was about 300 rpm, and the output rate was about10 kg/hr. The mixture was then extruded onto an air cooled beltconveyor, pelletized into approximately 2.5 mm×2.5 mm cylindricalpellets, and collected in a plastic bag.

Example 1: Printing Formulations 1-2, 4, and 6-7

A sample from each of Formulations 1-2, 4, and 6-7 was printed into 8cm³ cube using an ARBURG™ Freeformer (commercially available from ArburgGmbH, Lossburg, Germany). Formulations 1-2, 4, and 6-7 were dried at 90°C. for 8 hours prior to printing. After drying, each of Formulations wasindividually loaded into the Freeformer and printed into a cube that was2 cm×2 cm×2 cm using the following parameters: a nozzle size of 0.2 mm,a layer thickness of 0.2 mm, a part density of approximately 35%, adischarge of 80%, a droplet aspect ratio of 2.2. For each Formulation,the nozzle temperatures were 207° C., 200° C., 207° C., 190° C. and 207°C.; the back pressure was 80 bar; and the print speed was 40 mm/s. Abuild chamber temperature of 120° C. was used for printing Formulations1-2, 4, and 7; a build chamber temperature of 80° C. was used forprinting Formulation 6.

Example 2: Printing PEI and Formulation 6

PEI and Formulation 6 were printed using an ARBURG™ Freeformer(commercially available from Arburg GmbH, Lossburg, Germany). PEI wasdried at 100° C. for 8 hours and water soluble polymer Formulation 6 wasdried at 90° C. for 8 hours. After drying, the materials were loadedinto the Freeformer and a PEI part that was a 25 mm square, 0.4 mmthick, with an 11.50 mm overhang, 0.4 mm thick, attached to the squarebase by a 1 mm thick arm was printed using the following parameters: anozzle size of 0.20 mm, a layer thickness of 0.2 mm, a part density ofapproximately 90% for both the part and support material, a discharge of90 percent, and a droplet aspect ratio of 1.5. PEI was printed with anozzle temperature of 305° C., and a dosing back pressure of 50 bar.Formulation 6 was printed with a nozzle temperature of 207° C., and adosing back pressure of 80 bar. A build chamber temperature of 145° C.and a print speed was 20 mm/s on infill was used.

Example 3: Printing PEI and Formulation 2

As in Example 2, PEI and Formulation 2 were printed using an ARBURG™Freeformer (commercially available from Arburg GmbH, Lossburg, Germany).PEI was dried at 100° C. for 8 hours and water soluble polymerFormulation 2 was dried at 90° C. for 8 hours. After drying, thematerials were loaded into the Freeformer and a PEI part that was a 25mm square, 0.4 mm thick, with an 11.50 mm overhang, 0.4 mm thick,attached to the square base by a 1 mm thick arm was printed using thefollowing parameters: a nozzle size of 0.20 mm, a layer thickness of 0.2mm, a part density of approximately 90% for both the part and supportmaterial, a discharge of 90 percent, and a droplet aspect ratio of 1.5.PEI was printed with a nozzle temperature of 305° C., and a dosing backpressure of 50 bar. Formulation 2 was printed with a nozzle temperatureof 207° C., and a dosing back pressure of 80 bar. A build chambertemperature of 145° C. and a print speed was 20 mm/s on infill was used.

Example 4: Filament Preparation of Formulations 4 and 6-7

Filament preparation for Formulations 6-7 was conducted according to twoProcedures, A and B. In Procedure A, pellets from Formulations 6-7 weredried for four hours and then extruded at a screw speed of 20 rpm, atemperature profile of 180° C. for all extruder zones, and an outputrate of 5 kg/hr. The resulting filament was directed onto a heatedmulti-roll godet downstream unit, at 90° C. The godet-heated filament ofFormulation 6 was the drawn from its initial draw ratio to final a drawratio of 2:1. The godet-heated filament of Formulation was drawn fromits initial draw ratio to a final draw ratio of 1.5:1.

In Procedure B, pellets from Formulations 4 and 7 were extruded using a1.50″ single screw extruder (commercially available from AutomatedManufacturing Systems, West Palm Beach, Fla.) at a screw speed of 20 rpmand output rate of 5 kg/hr. All temperature zones after the feed throatwere heated to 200° C. The extruded filament was then cooled toapproximately 90-120° C. with air and then drawn using a downstreampuller and winding unit to provide a final draw ratios of approximately2:1. The resulting filament was approximately 1.75 mm in thickness.

Example 5: Makerbot Filament Formulation 4

A 1.75 mm thick filament of Formulation 4, produced according toProcedure B, was printed on a MAKERBOT REPLICATOR™ 2× (commerciallyavailable from MakerBot Industries, LLC) using the following conditions.The filament was directly fed into the Makerbot extruder. Extrudertemperature was 190° C. Conditions to print a stock file that comes withthe Makerbot software (shark) was utilized.

Dissolution Method Test 1: Formulations 1 and 3-5

For each of Formulations 1 and 3-5, a 2.5 gram pellet sample was placein about 50 mL deionized water at about 70° C. The dissolution time wasreported at the time when the sample was completely dissolved, such thatthere were no observable pellets. The results of are provided in Table4.

TABLE 4 DISSOLUTION METHOD TEST 1 RESULTS Formulation Dissolution Time(min) 1 16 3 14 4 10 5 8

Dissolution Method Test 2: Formulations 1-2, 4, and 6-7

The printed cube samples for each of Formulations 1-2, 4, and 6-7, asdescribed in Example 1, was subjected to Dissolution Method Test 2,described here as follows, A cube with a volume of about 8 cm³ wasplaced into a 250 mL beaker filled with 100 mL of 70° C. deionizedwater. Every minute, for about 15 minutes; a 2 mL aliquot was sampled,dried for 24 hours sere the amount of dissolved material wasgravimetrically measured. The dissolution rate was then calculated usingthe following equations.

${{Dissolved}\mspace{14mu} {{Mass}({mg})}\mspace{14mu} {at}\mspace{14mu} {time}\mspace{14mu} (t)} = {\left( \frac{{Residual}\mspace{14mu} {Mass}\mspace{14mu} \text{?}}{{Aliquot}\mspace{14mu} {Volume}\mspace{14mu} \text{?}} \right){Total}\mspace{14mu} {Volume}\mspace{14mu} \text{?}}$$\mspace{50mu} {{{Fraction}\mspace{14mu} {Dissolved}\mspace{14mu} {at}\mspace{14mu} {time}\mspace{14mu} (t)} = \frac{{Dissolved}\mspace{14mu} {{Mass}({mg})}\mspace{14mu} {at}\mspace{14mu} {time}\mspace{14mu} (t)}{{Initial}\mspace{14mu} {Mass}\mspace{14mu} {of}\mspace{14mu} {Cube}\mspace{14mu} ({mg})}}$?indicates text missing or illegible when filed

Empiric Model Calculations (Weibull):

$\mspace{104mu} {{{Calculated}\mspace{14mu} {Fraction}\mspace{14mu} {Dissolved}\mspace{14mu} {at}\mspace{14mu} {time}\mspace{14mu} (t)} = {\frac{M_{t}}{M_{i}} = {1 - \text{?}}}}$?indicates text missing or illegible when filed

Where M_(t) is the mass dissolved at time t, M_(i) is the initial cubemass, a is the scale parameter of the process, and b defines the shapeof the dissolution curve, and T_(l) is the lag time before dissolutiononset (typically his value is zero). From this empirical model anestimate of the time interval (T_(d)) necessary to dissolve about 63.2%of the cube can be calculated through the following relationship:

${T_{d}\left( {63.2\%} \right)} = {\sqrt[b]{a}\mspace{14mu} {minutes}}$

Although this is an empiric model, it produces an approximatedissolution rate based on the initial mass of the cube (M_(i)), and thetime interval it takes to dissolve about 63.2% of the sample.

${{Approximate}\mspace{14mu} {Dissolution}\mspace{14mu} {Rate}\mspace{14mu} \left( {{mg}\text{/}\min} \right)} = {\frac{\left( {0.632*M_{i}} \right)}{T_{d}} = \frac{\left( {0.632*M_{i}} \right)}{\left( \sqrt[b]{a} \right)}}$

The results are provided in Table 5.

TABLE 5 DISSOLUTION METHOD TEST 2 RESULTS 70° C. % % % DissolutionDissolution Dissolution Dissolution Rate Formulation at 1 min at 5 minat 10 min (mg/min) 1 1 40 90 340 2 5 50 70 390 4 5 75 95 480 6 35 95 1001440 7 11 60 80 460

Mandrel Knot Test of Formulations 4 and 6

Filament produced using Formulations 4 and 6 was subjected to mandrelknot testing. A 12″ long piece of filament was tied into a single knotover several HDPE cylindrical mandrel of varied diameter (3″, 2″ and 1″)and pulled taught by hand. A pass is defined as the filament notbreaking during this test. The results are shown below in Table 6.

TABLE 6 MANDREL KNOT TEST RESULTS Formulation Draw Ratio 1″ Mandrel 2″Mandrel 3″ Mandrel 4 0 Fail Fail Fail 4 1.5:1   Pass Pass Pass 6 0 FailFail Fail 6 3:1 Pass Pass Pass

DSC Characterizations

A differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) study was performed onFormulation 6 filaments with and without drawing. Table 7 shows that theenthalpy of fusion for Formulation 6 increases from 1.7 J/g to 8.7 J/gupon drawing the filament at a draw ratio of ˜3:1. However, upon removalof the thermal history, which was done by heating the stretched filamentabove melting temperature, cooling to room temperature, and thenre-heating above melting, the enthalpy decreased back to that observedfor the sample that was not drawn. This behavior of stress-inducedcrystallization is evident by DSC, which, to one skilled in the artwould suggest this material is semi-crystalline in nature.

TABLE 7 DSC ON FORMULATION 6 FILAMENT Processing Enthalpy of Enthalpy ofFusion (J/g) after Formulation Conditions Fusion (J/g) cooling andreheating 6 No draw 1.7 1.7 6 ~3:1 draw 8.7 1.7

Additionally, as shown in Table 8, DSC was performed on Sugar 1 andFormulations 1-2 and 6-7. Table 8's results show that Formulations 6 and7 are miscible blends. Specifically, only one glass transition andmelting temperature is observed.

TABLE 8 DSC FOR SUGAR 1 AND FILAMENT FORMULATIONS 1-2 AND 6-7 GlassTransition Melting Temperature Temperature Number of Melting Formulation(° C.) (° C.) Transitions 1 73 186 1 2 75 205 1 Sugar 1 N/A 196 1 6 91172 1 7 79 179 1

Having thus described particular embodiments, those of skill in the artwill readily appreciate that the teachings found herein may be appliedto yet other embodiments within the scope of the claims hereto attached.

What is claimed is:
 1. A water soluble polymer composition comprising: awater soluble polymer; and a sugar; wherein the water soluble polymerand sugar form a substantially miscible water soluble polymercomposition; and wherein the water soluble polymer composition issubstantially dry.
 2. The water soluble polymer composition of claim 1,wherein the water soluble polymer composition is substantially stable ata build chamber temperature of at least about 140° C.
 3. The watersoluble polymer composition of claim 1, wherein the water solublepolymer composition is substantially stable at a build chambertemperature of at least about 150° C.
 4. The water soluble polymercomposition of claim 1, wherein the water soluble polymer composition issubstantially stable at a build chamber temperature of at least about170°.
 5. The water soluble polymer composition of claim 1, wherein thewater soluble polymer composition is substantially stable at a buildchamber temperature of at least about 190° C.
 6. The water solublepolymer composition of claim 1, wherein the water soluble polymercomposition is substantially stable at a build chamber temperature of atleast about 210° C.
 7. The water soluble polymer composition accordingto claim 1, wherein the water soluble polymer comprises butendiolvinylalcohol copolymer.
 8. The water soluble polymer compositionaccording to claim 1, wherein the sugar comprises trehalose.
 9. Thewater soluble polymer composition according to claim 1, furthercomprising on ore more additives or polymers.
 10. The water solublepolymer composition according to claim 1, wherein the water solublepolymer composition is semi-crystalline.
 11. The water soluble polymercomposition according to claim 1, wherein the water soluble polymercomposition has a dissolution rate of 400 mg/min according todissolution test method 2
 12. The water soluble polymer compositionaccording to claim 1, wherein the water soluble polymer composition hasa dissolution rate of at least about 400 mg/min as determined byDissolution Test Method
 2. 13. A method comprising: processing the watersoluble polymer and sugar mixture to form a water soluble polymercomposition, such that the water soluble polymer composition issubstantially miscible and substantially dry; forming a feedstock fromthe water soluble polymer composition; and drawing the feedstock, suchthat the feedstock has a draw ratio.
 14. The method according to claim13, wherein the draw ratio of at least about 5:1.
 15. The methodaccording to claim 13, wherein the draw ratio of at least about 3:1. 16.The method according to claim 13, wherein the draw ratio of at leastabout 1.5:1.
 17. A water soluble support composition comprising: asemi-crystalline water soluble polymer having a dissolution rate of atleast 100 mg/min according to Dissolution Test Method 2 and issubstantially stable at build chamber temperatures of at least 140° C.18. A water soluble support composition of claim 18, wherein is drawndown during processing.
 19. A three-dimensional printed articlecomprising: a three-dimensional printed object generally disposed on asubstantially horizontal build plate; and one or more soluble supportspositioned about and supporting one or more portions of thethree-dimensional printed object, the soluble supports comprising awater soluble polymer composition.
 20. The three-dimensional printedarticle according to claim 19, wherein the water soluble polymercomprises butendiol vinylalcohol copolymer.